I'm reading this book named the "Anti-Chomsky Reader" by some dudes called Peter Collier and David Horowitz. I don't have much against Chomsky but I just want to get to know how his opposers actually criticise him. So far, I have come across bunch of information which I already had! “Chomsky is too much pro-Vietnamese and Cambodian Communism” or “His anti-Israel attitude is not just” or even (not literally) “his acts are against the great democracy and brilliant foreign policy of But this is not the end of the story; I certainly do have some things against Chomsky. (By the way, if you don’t know him, better check wikipedia and then read this post) Of course it takes a bit of overlooking-the-facts to admire what Ho Chi Minh or Mao did in their time. These fellas were absolute dictators; and when you mix dictatorship with communism in
My point (I think) is that it looks like there are “others” apart from either of these sides. I do believe that many leftist ideas (in the true sense of the meaning, not what they call “left” in Iran) –particularly economic ideas of left- would not work; and in the same time many right-wing ideas, especially typical social ideas of right, represent total cruelty. Perhaps a mixture of these might work better. (Wow! What an achievement!)
I reckon I would get to know both these sides and end up thinking how hypocrite everyone is! (Well, I already do think that hypocrisy is pretty much the foundation of many social and political ideas, or rather cults!)
Man, it was too sophisticated! I have no idea why I thought I can even think of politics!..
I’d like to put some pictures that I took from
PS: Even in a high-tech country like
Photo taken from Google; don't you want to sue me..
No comments:
Post a Comment